do known issues exist when snapshots used with quotas ?

[Kris Kennaway]

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:13:02PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:10:27AM -0800, Arne Woerner wrote:
> > --- Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 12:49:17PM -0500, Ensel Sharon wrote:
> > > > them) - just the quick question:  are there any known issues /
> > > > suspicions / hunches / lore about bad things happening when
> > > > snapshots are combined with quotas ?
> > > 
> > > Yes - I've even posted as such on this very list in the past few
> > > days, so I don't know why you're asking again.
> > > 
> > Hmm...
> > 
> > When was it? I just found some messages (mostly about not further
> > specified bugs)
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2006-March/author.html
> > 
> > But nothing about quota...
> > 
> > Would be astonishing if snapshots have side effects on
> > quota-feature-use, I think...
> 
> Since in 6.0 a) snapshots have bugs, and b) quotas have bugs, it
> should be hardly surprising to you that snapshots have bugs with
> quotas.

The moral of the story is: if you care about either of these features
then please test 6.1-beta4 in case there are further unresolved
problems :-)

Kris



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/attachments/20060314/0b8576c4/attachment.pgp