if_few borked?

[Hidetoshi Shimokawa]

At Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:04:47 +0200,
Stefan Bethke wrote:
> This is the first one:
> 
> >>> dmesg
> fwohci0: node_id=0x8800ffc0, gen=1, non CYCLEMASTER mode
> # fwcontrol -t
> crc_len: 4 generation:1 node_count:2 sid_count:2
> id link gap_cnt speed delay cIRM power port0 port1 port2 ini more
> 00    1       5  S400     0    1   15W     P     -     -   1    0
> 01    1       5  S400     0    1   15W     -     C     -   0    0
> 
> 
> This is the second one:
> 
> >>> dmesg
> fwohci0: node_id=0x8800ffc0, gen=1, non CYCLEMASTER mode
> # fwcontrol -t
> crc_len: 4 generation:1 node_count:2 sid_count:2
> id link gap_cnt speed delay cIRM power port0 port1 port2 ini more
> 00    1      63  S400     0    1   15W     -     P     -   1    0
> 01    1      63  S400     0    1   15W     C     -     -   0    0

The problem is that they think they are both node 0. This couldn't
happen. The higher node id becames cycle master.

Does Unpluging and pluging the cable give same result?
Do you any other cables to replace?

> I also did a bus reset on the second box:
> # fwcontrol -r
> fwohci0: Initiate bus reset
> # fwcontrol
> 1 devices (info_len=1)
> node       EUI64       status
>    0  000000301b27b017      0
> # fwcontrol -t
> crc_len: 4 generation:1 node_count:2 sid_count:2
> id link gap_cnt speed delay cIRM power port0 port1 port2 ini more
> 00    1      63  S400     0    1   15W     -     P     -   1    0
> 01    1      63  S400     0    1   15W     C     -     -   0    0

generation should be incremented, strange..

/\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa
\/  simokawa at sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
PGP public key: http://www.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~simokawa/pgp.html