linux-tiff port update

[Ian Moore]

On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:14, Jacques Vidrine wrote:
> On 2/26/05 8:11 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Hello security team, is this an error in the vuln.xml document or is the
> > commit log of the port-Makefile misleading
>
> It's our bad.  It looks like we mistakenly believed the FreeBSD package
> version numbers were aligned between tiff and linux-tiff.
>
> > (and Suse is still
> > vulnerable, since they don't offer newer packages)?
>
> No, these issues are fixed in those packages.
>
> Cheers,

So does that mean I should be able to upgrade from linux-tiff-3.5.5_2 to 
linux-tiff-3.6.1_1 without the security vunerabilty warning now? (Because I 
still the warnings)

Cheers,

-- 
Ian

GPG Key: http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~imoore/no-spam.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/attachments/20050228/510f9821/attachment.bin