Need Eclipse 3.2
Frank Staals
frank at fstaals.net
Thu May 24 19:00:23 UTC 2007
Rick C. Petty wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:52:44AM +0300, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:39:14PM -0500, Rick C. Petty wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure what you mean by "distro". The port currently provides
>>> Eclipse 3.2.1. Granted that's not the latest, but I haven't had the time
>>> to commit 3.2.2 yet (I have a working port). This mailing list also
>>> seems pretty dead.
>>>
>> Could you please share (as a shar) your port? ;)
>>
>
> Is a tarball of the port's directory acceptable? The attached is what I
> used to build the eclipse-3.2.2 port for me. Anyone feel free to send-pr
> to update the java/eclipse port(s), or I'll do it this weekend (hopefully
> tomorrow, actually). I only tried compiling for i386 not amd64. Be
> warned that the compile took *hours* on my X2 dual-core 4400+.
>
> Good luck,
>
> -- Rick C. Petty
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Only (re)compiling Eclipse took hours ? that shouldn't realy be the
case. I have to admit it has been a while I compiled/installed my
eclipse release ( eclipse-3.2.1_1 ) but If I recall correclty it only
took me about an hour or so on my Laptop with AMD XP-M 2800+ ( I did
have all the dependencies including diablo-jdk-1.5 allready ). So it
seems a bit weird to me it should take that long to recompile it. ( or
should I take the *hours* not that literally )
--
-Frank Staals
More information about the freebsd-eclipse
mailing list