minor rewording for committers guide
sonic2000gr at gmail.com
Sat Oct 15 18:57:01 UTC 2011
On 15/10/2011 8:46 μμ, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> I was trying to find the repo for the www, but the note IMO was poorly
> worded, so I have this patch. Should I go ahead and commit?
> P.S. I'm not on the list, so please include me in the reply.
> Index: article.sgml
> RCS file: /home/dcvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.sgml,v
> retrieving revision 1.303
> diff -u -r1.303 article.sgml
> --- article.sgml 11 Sep 2011 18:04:15 -0000 1.303
> +++ article.sgml 15 Oct 2011 17:40:26 -0000
> @@ -304,9 +304,10 @@
> <application>CVS</application> but in Subversion. The official
> and exported trees are not necessarily equal.</para>
> -<note><para>Note that the<literal>www</literal> module containing sources
> - for the<ulink url="http://www.FreeBSD.org">FreeBSD website</ulink> is
> - contained within the<literal>doc</literal> repository.</para></note>
> +<note><para>Note that the sources for the
> +<ulink url="http://www.FreeBSD.org">FreeBSD website</ulink> are
> + contained within the<literal>www</literal> module of the
> +<literal>doc</literal> repository.</para></note>
> <para>The CVS repositories are hosted on the repository machines.
> Currently, each of the repositories above reside on the same physical
Looks fine here, I'd say go ahead!
More information about the freebsd-doc