Want to help with handbook

[Doug Barton]

Cristian KLEIN wrote:

> I haven't really understood your question, but I hope the following info
> will answer it.
> 
> Originally, ipfw requires netif, while ipf is before netif. This places
> ipfw explicitly after ipf. I honestly have absolutely no idea why the
> dependencies are like this.

This would be a good issue to bring up on freebsd-rc at .

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection