docs/90515: Use new patch naming convention in Porter's Handbook

[Kövesdán Gábor]

The following reply was made to PR docs/90515; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan at t-hosting.hu>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon at lonesome.com>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/90515: Use new patch naming convention in Porter's Handbook
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:12:48 +0100

 Mark Linimon wrote:
 
 >On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:29:33PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
 >  
 >
 >>According to http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/PortsLongtermTargets the new
 >>patch naming convention requires to use :: signs for specifying paths in the
 >>patch filenames, e.g. patch-src::config.c, but Porter's Handbook describes the
 >>old naming convention, e.g. patch-src-config.c.
 >>    
 >>
 >
 >Then the wiki is wrong.  The Porter's Handbook is correct.
 >
 >Is the other part of your change still relevant even with this being the case?
 >  
 >
 No. So, if I make a port, I should use the patch-src-config.c form 
 instead of patch-src::config.c?