docs/79901: Incoherence of the recipient to whom to send a followup in the problem-reports article.
jpeg at thilelli.net
Thu Apr 14 12:10:28 UTC 2005
The following reply was made to PR docs/79901; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Julien Gabel" <jpeg at thilelli.net>
To: "Giorgos Keramidas" <keramida at freebsd.org>
Cc: bug-followup at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/79901: Incoherence of the recipient to whom to send a
followup in the problem-reports article.
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:02:45 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> The FreeBSD article 'problem-reports' says that there exists two methods
>> to submit a followup: either use the followup link on the individual
>> PR's web page, or just mail it to <bug-followup at FreeBSD.org>. I think
>> the incoherence come from the fact that the @email found on the
>> individual PR's web page actually is <freebsd-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org>
>> which is different than <bug-followup at FreeBSD.org>.
> The bug-followup address is an alias for freebsd-gnats-submit. It doesn't
> really matter which one you use.
Ok, thank you for this subtlety :)
>> Because i don't which email recipient is the good one (better one?), i
>> don't know which of the two parts must be adjusted: the bottom part of
>> individual PRs, or the problem-reports article.
> I prefer the first one, since bug-followup@ is more friendly to us human
> earthlings than some obscure gnats-dependent alias. The bug-followup
> address is easier to remember, because it matches the functionality of
> the alias (followup/reply to a bug report).
So in this case, maybe that the very little attached patch will be enough
to adjusts this point. Thanks.
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="query-pr.cgi.patch"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="query-pr.cgi.patch"
More information about the freebsd-doc