docs/79901: Incoherence of the recipient to whom to send a followup in the problem-reports article.

[Julien Gabel]

>Number:         79901
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       Incoherence of the recipient to whom to send a followup in the problem-reports article.
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Apr 14 10:20:14 GMT 2005
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Julien Gabel
>Release:        FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD titeuf.thilelli.net 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Wed Apr 13 06:07:41 CEST 2005 root at titeuf.thilelli.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TITEUF i386
>Description:
	The FreeBSD article 'problem-reports' says that there exists two methods to submit a followup: either use the
followup link on the individual PR's web page, or just mail it to <bug-followup at FreeBSD.org>. I think the incoherence
come from the fact that the @email found on the individual PR's web page actually is <freebsd-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org>
which is different than <bug-followup at FreeBSD.org>.
>How-To-Repeat:
	Compare the information found at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/pr-followup.html
and the link provided at the foot of the page at, for example: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/58154
>Fix:
	Because i don't which email recipient is the good one (better one?), i don't know which of the two parts must be
adjusted: the bottom part of individual PRs, or the problem-reports article.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: