PR docs/21708

Tom Rhodes trhodes at
Thu Oct 16 08:15:33 UTC 2003

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:05:25 -0400
Ken Smith <kensmith at cse.Buffalo.EDU> wrote:

> What is the procedure for suggesting a PR that appears to be old and
> forgotten be closed?
> PR docs/21708 complains that the wording for the "timeout" value
> in kevent(2) is ambiguous.  I don't know if someone fixed it on their
> own but the current wording is:

If it seems to be fixed either close it or set it to feedback for
a period of time.  I think the PR doc has more information on this
that I can comment on.

Tom Rhodes

More information about the freebsd-doc mailing list