PR docs/21708

[Tom Rhodes]

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:05:25 -0400
Ken Smith <kensmith at cse.Buffalo.EDU> wrote:

> 
> What is the procedure for suggesting a PR that appears to be old and
> forgotten be closed?
> 
> PR docs/21708 complains that the wording for the "timeout" value
> in kevent(2) is ambiguous.  I don't know if someone fixed it on their
> own but the current wording is:
> 

If it seems to be fixed either close it or set it to feedback for
a period of time.  I think the PR doc has more information on this
that I can comment on.

-- 
Tom Rhodes