Is this correct?

[Tom Rhodes]

On Tue, 20 May 2003 22:22:00 +0100
Ceri Davies <setantae at submonkey.net> wrote:

> 
> I'm pretty sure that this patch is correct, but not 100%.  Comments?
> 
> Ceri
> -- 
> 
> Index: sgml-markup/chapter.sgml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/dcvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/sgml-markup/chapter.sgml,v
> retrieving revision 1.54
> diff -u -r1.54 chapter.sgml
> --- sgml-markup/chapter.sgml	20 May 2003 21:18:38 -0000	1.54
> +++ sgml-markup/chapter.sgml	20 May 2003 21:20:33 -0000
> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@
>  
>        <para>Some elements may exist in two forms, <emphasis>formal</emphasis>
>  	and <emphasis>informal</emphasis>.  Typically, the formal version of
> -	the element will consist of a title followed by the information
> +	the element will consist of a title followed by the informal
>  	version of the element.  The informal version will not have a
>  	title.</para>
>      </note>
> 

This, looks correct.  Mainly the fact that the next line talks about
the 'informal version'.

--
Tom Rhodes