port maintainers not in contrib.additional.sgml

Pav Lucistnik pav at FreeBSD.org
Mon Dec 8 00:39:23 UTC 2003

V po, 08. 12. 2003 v 01:32, Mike Patterson píše:

> > Rather than maintainer field you should pursue Whom: from port Makefiles
> > headers.
> Not that it really matters to me, but if somebody contributes a port and 
> then drops it, and somebody else takes it over, why should that somebody 
> else not get credit for that, if credit is to be assigned?  Maintaining 
> is just as important as the original submission, no?

I misunderstood your point. I was under impression you only want to
complete the list by adding missing entries under current "rules" [1].

If you're about to add all authors *and* maintainers than it's
completely different question.

[1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html

Pav Lucistnik <pav at FreeBSD.org>
              <pav at oook.cz>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je digit?ln? podepsan? ??st zpr?vy
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/attachments/20031208/c45ba435/attachment.sig>

More information about the freebsd-doc mailing list