Proposed addition to the mail section of the handbook

[Christian Brueffer]

On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:22:17AM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:00:21 +0100
> Josef El-Rayes <j.el-rayes at daemon.li> wrote:
> 
> > Christian Brueffer <chris at unixpages.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:18:25PM +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> > 
> > > > line 72: it is "manpage" not "man page".
> > 
> > > Actually it is 'manual page'.
> > 
> > i prefer too, the expression 'manual page', but as
> > bill used the short form, i just wanted to point out
> > that o'reilly writes it 'manpage' and not 'man page'.
> > 
> > (http://www.oreilly.com/oreilly/author/stylesheet.html#M).
> 
> It always depends on who you talk to too.  Some people say man
> page, some use manual page, some use manpage.  Trust me, this
> is a bikeshed you don't want to step into...  :)
> 

Of course.  What I meant to say was 'manual page is what we usually use
for our documentation' :-)

- Christian

-- 
Christian Brueffer	chris at unixpages.org	brueffer at FreeBSD.org
GPG Key:	 http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc
GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B  B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/attachments/20031202/5361920c/attachment.sig>