13.0-CURRENT r356767 wanted ZFS

Ben Woods woodsb02 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 17 13:33:18 UTC 2020


On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 17:24, Ben Woods <woodsb02 at gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:18:41AM +0000, Clay Daniels wrote:
>
>> >> 13.0-CURRENT r356767 would not take NO for an answer, and kept up a
>> loop
>> >> until I gave up trying to use UFS. No big deal, seems to work fine...
>> >>
>> >> Clay
>>
>
> It does seem like this could be related to my commit (see below). Although
> I runtime tested installs with both ZFS and UFS options, so I’m surprised.
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/356758
>
> I’ll try to have a look at it tonight.
>
> Regards,
> Ben
>

Hi Clay,

Thanks for reporting this issue. I was able to replicate it using
bsdinstall on the latest snapshot ISO
FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200116-r356767-disc1.iso.

It turns out the commit that introduced the regression was r356740.

I have submitted a fix for review here:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23232

Regards,
Ben

--
From: Benjamin Woods
woodsb02 at gmail.com


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list