Outdated jemalloc in CURRENT

[Yuri Pankov]

Gordon Bergling wrote:
> I am not sure, that this info is correct. As far as I remember the update for jemalloc was reverted due to build problems, on some architecture. An updated revision has still to be commited to -CURRENT.

That's exactly what the commit log says, yes?

> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 07:20:03AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 03:05:25PM +0300, nonameless at ukr.net wrote:
>>> Hi everyone!
>>>
>>> As I see, CURRENT still uses outdated jemalloc 5.1.0 with some performance regressions that was fixed in 5.2.1.
>>>
>>> Are there some issues that blocking update jemalloc to recent version?
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r354606 | jasone | 2019-11-10 21:06:49 -0800 (Sun, 10 Nov 2019) | 4 lines
>>
>> Revert r354605: Update jemalloc to version 5.2.1.
>>
>> Compilation fails for non-llvm-based platforms.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r354605 | jasone | 2019-11-10 19:27:14 -0800 (Sun, 10 Nov 2019) | 2 lines
>>
>> Update jemalloc to version 5.2.1.