LUA loader: bhyve now doesn't?

[Kyle Evans]

On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Larry Rosenman <ler at lerctr.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:28:10AM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote:
>> > filesystem?
>> >
>>
>> (CC'ing jhb@ and tychon@, who might have better insight)
>>
>> If we can swing it, I think the best model here should have always
>> been that userboot uses the host's scripts but the guest's
>> loader.conf. The current model doesn't tolerate any mismatch between
>> host and guest and looks unsustainable.
>
> Yeah, I have a FreeBSD-10, and a HardendBSD-12 VM, and BOTH failed until
> I loaded the old /boot/userboot.so to my host.
>
> We really need to tolerate this condition, and NOT surprise the user.

Right. That's what we're trying to figure out here, the best route
forward to make this stuff reliably work.