libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

[Lars Engels]

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:56:21PM -0500, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 18 November 2015 at 15:46, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo at iet.unipi.it> wrote:
> > i was going to suggest doing ldd on the binaries or a grep on the
> > Makefile but the latter returns a surprisingly low number
> > of matches.
> 
> That's because it's usually added via LIBADD=xo.
> 
> My grep turns up these: bin/df, bin/ls, bin/ps, sbin/savecore,
> usr.bin/iscsictl, usr.bin/netstat, usr.bin/procstat, usr.bin/w,
> usr.bin/wc, usr.bin/xo

Thanks!

Unfortenately only a part of them mention --libxo in its manpage.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 603 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20151120/88efecc7/attachment.bin>