Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Warner Losh imp at bsdimp.com
Fri Jun 20 04:00:10 UTC 2014


On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> 
>> See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner,
>> unfortunately.  This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which
>> was *not* redundant. :-/
> 
> 
> Warner,
> 
> Is there a way to bring back the behavior of r257658 but without
> the way it was implemented with the EARLY_BUILD flag?
> It would be handy, as we can see by this thread discussion.

OK. I must be daft, or maybe just missing something. But I can build 9.3 almost branch point on a current jail running on a 10.x system (to simulate the 9 on current case). I don’t see the problem being talked about at all. As for 9 on 10, I was also able to do a build, but my 10.x system may not have been pristine.

Warner

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20140619/423094e6/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list