libexecinfo?

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:57:35PM +0000, Walter Hurry wrote:
> We had a recent issue with libiconv now being included in base, thus 
> rendering the port superfluous.
> 
> Does a similar situation exist with libexecinfo? I don't seem to need the 
> port on on 10.0-ALPHA1 r255587, and htop and ruby both build quite 
> happily without it. The library is /usr/lib/libexecinfo.so.1.
> 

libexecinfo in base is exactly the same as the on from ports, so it should be a
change that doesn't require any manual operations.

regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20130918/20388f26/attachment.sig>