GCC withdraw
Boris Samorodov
bsam at passap.ru
Fri Aug 23 11:22:28 UTC 2013
23.08.2013 15:16, Kurt Jaeger пишет:
> Hi!
>
>>> I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code
>>> slush that removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build on
>>> platforms where clang is the system compiler. We definitely don't
>>> want to be supporting our 6-year-old versions of these for the
>>> lifetime of the 10.x branch.
>>
>> Isn't it a POLA violation?
>>
>> As for me I expect something like this:
>> . 9.x gcc default and clang in base;
>> . 10.x clang default and gcc in base;
>> . 11.x gcc withdraw.
>
> If the 150 ports that only work with gcc, all work with a ports
> gcc and do not need the gcc from base, would the following be OK ?
>
> - 9.x gcc default and clang in base;
> - 10.x clang default and gcc in ports;
Well, we write rules and we brake them. ;-)
Just say that we know we brake them but it's inevitable because...
And go futher.
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list