CURRENT crashes with nvidia GPU BLOB : vm_radix_insert: key 23c078 is already present

[O. Hartmann]

On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:39:48 +0200
Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn at googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:59:22 +0200
> "O. Hartmann" <ohartman at zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:31:19 +0200
> > Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:10:40 +0200
> > > Rainer Hurling <rhurlin at gwdg.de> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Yes, I can confirm, that it builds, installs and runs fine for
> > > > me.
> > > > 
> > > > The patch should be placed as
> > > > x11/nvidia-driver/files/patch-src__nvidia_subr.c, shoudn't it?
> > > > 
> > > > Many thanks for this work.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks for testing.
> > > 
> > > Yes, putting the patch into files/ with that name works also and
> > > is much simpler than the steps I outlined.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Placing the patch in files as recommended here doesn't play well
> > with the obvious intention of the REINPLACE command:
> > 
> > the patch only applies to 319.25.
> > 
> > I use the cutting edge 325.15. The patch doesn't apply since some
> > lines shifted - here comes the tricky REINPLACE part of the
> > Makefile in place.
> > 
> > I simply adapted your patches discussed and introduced here and
> > "adapted" the REINPLACE statements/pattern around line 160 in the
> > toplevel Makefile of port x11/nvidia-driver.
> > 
> > Find the patch attached - I forgot to raise PORTREVISION=1.
> > 
> > I'm now sending this email from the prior crashing box with the
> > patch discussed applied via the Makefile to 325.15.
> > 
> > Thanks a lot for the fast help.
> > 
> 
> Yes, this is a better approach.  I made my patch before realizing
> that the REINPLACE_CMD was the source of the errors.
> 
> Any real advantage to using 325.15?

Well, nvidia claims they have fixed bugs and it is the successor in
line after 319.25. It is stable, it is the newest, it is so far nice :-)

> 
> You should submit a PR with this patch.
> 

Well, I do. I thought it isn't my honour since I simply made a profit
from the labor of others here and I simply picked up crumps.

Well, I added a followup to port/181144.

Oliver

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20130810/2e5efdf8/attachment.sig>