Upgrading FreeBSD to use the NEW pf syntax. (Copied from freebsd-pf)
Aldis Berjoza
graudeejs at yandex.ru
Tue Nov 20 16:52:16 UTC 2012
20.11.2012, 18:34, "Chuck Burns" <break19 at gmail.com>:
> On 11/20/2012 10:27 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> On 11/20/12 11:43, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>>> 2012/11/20 Paul Webster <paul.g.webster at googlemail.com>:
>>>> I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
>>>> believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
>>>> style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause to much confusion.
>>> But a change like this is expected in a new major branch, ie.
>>> 10-CURRENT. Not so in -STABLE branches of course. I don't see the
>>> problem here.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>> What would be the alternative? Being stuck with the old PF? As Olivier
>> Smedts said, changes like that are expected in a complete new branch. If
>> people need to stay compatible, they are about to use 9.X as long as
>> they have migrated. The downside is more work. The bright side would be
>> development/progression.
>>
>> oh
>
> Why not release pf2 as a port? Then those who want the new pf can use
> it, and those that want the old one can use it.
>
> Or, another option is a knob USE_NEWPF during buildworld will build the
> new pf, otherwise it'd build the old, default one.
>
> This way you can still introduce the change, but default to the old one
> for those of us who are too crusty to change. :)
>
FreeBSD already have 3x firewalls. Having 4th m I think, isn't desired.
--
Aldis Berjoza
FreeBSD addict
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list