ports on 10.0-CURRENT: r226027 is incorrect fix

[Hartmann, O.]

On 10/10/11 21:04, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100
> Chris Rees <utisoft at gmail.com> mentioned:
>
>> Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed
>> something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it.
>>
>> Since when can anyone just commit stuff to bsd.port.mk, regardless of its
>> location?
>>
>> This is a bad solution, please revert it or I will when I get back. We're
>> going to end up being asked to support it on ports@ otherwise.
>>
> You certianly missed something, including the rationale behind the portmgr@
> descision of not committing to the ports tree (!) bsd.port.mk.  Go find
> some useful work to do like deleting old ports or whatever.  You might want
> to consider deleting all mine ports, as I'm not going to support them anymore
> (after you backed out this fix without approval I don't have a working ports
> tree anymore on any of my 3 workstations).
>
Hello? Is there need for this barbarian rude tone?

Regards,
oh