bitcount32: replace lengthy comment with SWAR reference
Stefan Bethke
stb at lassitu.de
Sat May 7 21:19:17 UTC 2011
Am 07.05.2011 um 22:59 schrieb Andriy Gapon:
> on 07/05/2011 23:22 Stefan Bethke said the following:
>>
>> Am 07.05.2011 um 12:47 schrieb Kostik Belousov:
>>
>>> On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 12:58:11PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think that the SWAR reference should be more concise and should lead an
>>>> interested reader to more information on the topic (and more up-to-date as well).
>>>>
>>> SWAR acronim seems to be a wikipedia invention. Without the abbreviation,
>>> the trimmed down comment looks better, IMHO.
>>
>> How about a proper reference, for example Warren's Hackers Delight (p. 65)?
>
> Hm, what makes that reference proper or more (most) proper?
> My top google results for SWAR seem to point to materials created by inventors
> of the algorithm.
Your google-fu is clearly superior. It took me a couple tries to find the page you're refering to.
http://aggregate.org/MAGIC/#Population%20Count%20%28Ones%20Count%29
Why not put a link in there directly? I just prefer a reference I can actually look up over an acronym that (by itself) cannot easily be resolved.
The algorithm itself seems to predate SWAR significantly: according to Hackers Delight, it was described in /Combinatorial Algorithms: Theory and Pratice/ in 77.
The code in systm.h appears to be a slightly less optimized version of the algorithm presented in SWAR or Hacker's Delight.
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke <stb at lassitu.de> Fon +49 151 14070811
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list