FreeBSD Compiler Benchmark: gcc-base vs. gcc-ports vs. clang
jakub_lach at mailplus.pl
Sun Mar 13 19:19:02 UTC 2011
Vinícius Zavam wrote:
> i'm still curious about things like CPUTYPE= and -march= configured as
> native, gentlemen.
> is it the "golden egg" to use with our system or not? why "natives"
> aren't in the benchs?
> /me feels confused.
> Vinícius Zavam
Apparently -march=native would equal -march=core2
with 65nm generation Core2s, this is not the case with
Penryns.. But there are none in the test?
However, I agree that testing with -march=native
would be simpler and more straightforward.
- Jakub Lach
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Compiler-Benchmark%3A-gcc-base-vs.-gcc-ports-vs.-clang-tp31119986p31138978.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the freebsd-current