Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

[Michael Larabel]

On 12/15/2011 08:26 AM, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> 15.12.2011 17:36, Michael Larabel пишет:
>> On 12/15/2011 07:25 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
>>> Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel:
>>>> No, the same hardware was used for each OS.
>>>>
>>>> In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was 
>>>> used.
>>> Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on FreeBSD, while UFS2 (with
>>> journaling enabled) should be an obvious choice since it is more 
>>> similar
>>> in concept to ext4 and since that is what most FreeBSD users will use
>>> with FreeBSD?
>>
>> I was running some ZFS vs. UFS tests as well and this happened to have
>> ZFS on when I was running some other tests.
>>
>
> Can we look at the tests?
> My opinion is ZFS without tuning is much slower than UFS2.
>

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNjg