possible mountroot regression
Andriy Gapon
avg at FreeBSD.org
Tue Aug 30 10:01:56 UTC 2011
So, just to re-iterate, I think that this is indeed a regression and the one
that could be particularly unhelpful for a new release - the time when people
are much more likely to end up at the mountroot prompt during an installation of
a new system or an upgrade.
on 29/08/2011 23:19 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 29/08/2011 19:45 Marcel Moolenaar said the following:
>>
>> On Aug 29, 2011, at 1:21 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> on 27/08/2011 18:16 Marcel Moolenaar said the following:
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 26, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems that after the introduction of the mountroot scripting language a user
>>>>> now has exactly one chance to try to specify a correct root device at the
>>>>> mountroot prompt. I am not sure that that is convenient/enough.
>>>>
>>>> This is no different from before.
>>>
>>> Are you sure?
>>> I remember trying multiple (incorrect) possibilities at the prompt and not
>>> getting the panic. But I know that sometimes I have cases of "false memories",
>>> so _I_ am not sure.
>>
>> I'm sure now that we're both not sure :-)
>>
>> It's possible the failure mode varied by how the root mount
>> failed...
>
>
> Judging from the code before r214006 it shouldn't have panic-ed upon such a failure:
> static int
> vfs_mountroot_ask(void)
> {
> char name[128];
> char *mountfrom;
> char *options;
>
> for(;;) {
> ...
> gets(name, sizeof(name), 1);
> if (name[0] == '\0')
> return (1);
> if (name[0] == '?') {
> printf("\nList of GEOM managed disk devices:\n ");
> g_dev_print();
> continue;
> }
> if (!vfs_mountroot_try(name, NULL))
> return (0);
> }
> }
>
>
> So this "endless" loop was exited only if vfs_mountroot_try() returned success
> (error == 0) or if a user entered an empty string.
>
--
Andriy Gapon
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list