[dtrace] syscall provider naming convention.

[Andriy Gapon]

on 21/12/2010 11:27 Artem Belevich said the following:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Artem Belevich <fbsdlist at src.cx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> It would be nice to get the i386 counterpart too when this goes into the tree.
>>
>> Here's updated version that has syscall:linux32 working on i386, too.
>>
>> https://sites.google.com/site/abc678site/files/dt-systrace-20101221.patch.gz
> 
> Forgot to mention. The patch is against stable/8 r216436

The previous version applied fine to head, I think that that should be the case
with this version too.

I have one comment though.  I am not sure about renaming syscall.ko to
syscall_freebsd.ko.  Perhaps we could keep the old name?  Or add a new module
under that name that would load native syscall module and all emulation syscall
modules (if any)?

-- 
Andriy Gapon