sched_pin() bug in SCHED_ULE

Andriy Gapon avg at icyb.net.ua
Thu Aug 26 22:10:46 UTC 2010


on 27/08/2010 00:20 mdf at FreeBSD.org said the following:
> 
> I tried making sched_pin() a real function which used
> intr_disable/intr_restore around saving off td->td_oncpu,
> td->td_lastcpu and ts->ts_cpu, and the stack at the time of call.  In
> sched_switch when I saw an unexpected migration I printed all that
> out.  I found that on my boxes, at sched_pin() time ts_cpu was already
> different from td->td_oncpu, so the specific problem I was having was
> that while another thread can change ts_cpu it has no way to force
> that thread to immediately migrate.

Like e.g. in sched_affinity where ts_cpu is first changed and then the old cpu
is ipi-ed?

> I believe the below patch fixes the issue, though I'm open to other methods:
> 
> 
> Index: kern/sched_ule.c
> ===================================================================
> --- kern/sched_ule.c	(.../head/src/sys)	(revision 158279)
> +++ kern/sched_ule.c	(.../branches/BR_BUG_67957/src/sys)	(revision 158279)
> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@
>  /* flags kept in ts_flags */
>  #define	TSF_BOUND	0x0001		/* Thread can not migrate. */
>  #define	TSF_XFERABLE	0x0002		/* Thread was added as transferable. */
> +#define	TSF_BINDING	0x0004		/* Thread is being bound. */

I don't really follow why TSF_BINDING is needed, i.e. why TSF_BOUND is not
sufficient in this case?

-- 
Andriy Gapon


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list