alex at mailinglist.ahhyes.net
Mon Oct 12 04:35:29 UTC 2009
Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 01:49:27PM +1100, Alex R wrote:
>> Steve Kargl wrote:
>>> So, you have 4 cpus and 4 folding-at-home processes and you're
>>> trying to use the system with other apps? Switch to 4BSD.
>> I thought SCHED_ULE was meant to be a much better choice under an SMP
>> environment. Why are you suggesting he rebuild his kernel and use the
>> legacy scheduler?
> If you have N cpus and N+1 numerical intensitive applications,
> ULE may have poor performance compared to 4BSD. In OP's case,
> he has 4 cpus and 4 numerical intensity (?) applications. He,
> however, also is trying to use the system in some interactive
Ah ok. Is this just an accepted thing by the freebsd dev's or are they
trying to fix it?
More information about the freebsd-current