FreeBSD 8.0 Performance (at Phoronix)
David Naylor
naylor.b.david at gmail.com
Mon Nov 30 09:17:30 UTC 2009
HI,
Phoronix recently published a comparative benchmark[1] for FreeBSD 7.2/8.0
against Linux and OpenSolaris. I would like to bring some of the good and bad
to light (in the hopes that the developers with the correct expertise will be
intrigued).
The tests were performed with a 'standard' installation of FreeBSD on a Lenovo
ThinkPad T61.
I've tried to eliminate tests who's performance is a result of compiler
differences and/or 3rd party applications and tests who's statistical
significance are not so strong (subjective guess).
Improvements for FreeBSD 8.0 vs 7.2:
- 7-Zip Compression (page 3)
- Timed MAFFT Alignment (page 5)
- GraphicsMagick (page 5)
- Threaded IO (64MB Random Write - 32 threads) (page 7)
- Threaded IO (64MB Read - 32 threads) (page 7)
Regressions for FreeBSD 8.0 vs 7.2:
- Gzip compressions of a 2GB file (page 3)
- C-Ray (page 4)
- Threaded IO (64MB Write - 4 threads) (page 7)
- Threaded IO (64MB Write - 32 threads) (page 7)
Poor performance relative to Linux and OpenSolaris
- Threaded IO (especially random writes) (page 7)
- OpenSSL (RSA 4096bit) (page 8)
- PostMark (disk transaction) (page 8)
It appears that threaded activity on UFS does not fair well against Linux/ext4
and OpenSolaris/ZFS. Phoronix intends to do a comparative test against
FreeBSD and OpenSolaris on ZFS.
Regards,
David
1)
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20091130/c9473545/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list