jfvogel at gmail.com
Tue Mar 3 15:55:40 PST 2009
I will make the Intel drivers utilize this in 8, its just one task among
many in my queue.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Barney Cordoba <barney_cordoba at yahoo.com>wrote:
> --- On Tue, 3/3/09, Navdeep Parhar <nparhar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: Multiqueue status
> > To: "Barney Cordoba" <barney_cordoba at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: current at freebsd.org
> > Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 3:30 PM
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 04:37:45AM -0800, Barney Cordoba
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I see some mention of INET_MULTIQUEUE and use of a new
> > flowid in the mbuf
> > > packet header, but don't see anywhere that the
> > flowid is set. Is this a
> > > future feature, or is this currently implemented?
> > There is at least one driver, cxgb(4), that makes use of
> > flowid. You
> > can browse through the files in sys/dev/cxgb/ to see how
> > it's used.
> > Regards,
> > Navdeep
> Yes I noticed that. I'm working on igb/ixgbe for a commercial
> application for 7.x, and I'd like to implement it in a way that is
> somewhat compatible with 8. I'm just playing with it at this point
> to see the performance trade offs.
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-current