flash10 vs f10
bsam at ipt.ru
Fri Jun 26 19:31:55 UTC 2009
"Sean C. Farley" <scf at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> Juergen Lock <nox at jelal.kn-bremen.de> writes:
>>> Anyway, on to www/linux-f8-flashplugin10 with OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT
>>> and OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS both f10: I got that going after
>>> removing libidn from the port's USE_LINUX_APPS (its part of linux_base-f10)
>>> and installing two new dependencies of f10's libcurl:
>>> libldap-2.4.so.2 in openldap-2.4.12-1.fc10.i386.rpm
>>> libsasl2.so.2 in cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.22-19.fc10.i386.rpm
>>> (so we'll need two new ports for these),
>> Are you sure that those two ports are necessary? I had no reports
>> that something doesn't work without those libraries.
>>> and then finally to get
>>> libflashsupport working too (i.e., audio) I had to
>>> ln -s libssl.so.7 /compat/linux/lib/libssl.so.6
>>> - so we probably need a new linux-f10-flashsupport too if we want to
>>> avoid that symlink.
>> Can you provide one? Then we can create a repocopy and commit
>> a new port. Thanks!
> Here you go (at least for the binary):
OK, thanks! I should have missed you previous post.
Here is a port for tests. This shar should be run at /usr/ports/www:
Note: the port is only hand-written and tested to build/install/deinstall.
More information about the freebsd-current