PCC and FreeBSD in the future?

[David Leimbach]

On 10/17/07, Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 03:25:57PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote:
> > On 10/17/07, Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:28:01PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote:
> > >
> > > http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#license
> >
> > Google's not broken at all thanks... First hit for llvm-gcc shows the
> > following.
> >
>
> And, the first hit of llvm is the llvm home page.  Read it and
> the FAQ link above and you'll find that llvm isn't derived from
> GCC.


Already knew that.  I was querying about llvm-gcc.  Sorry that I was too
terse to make that clear originally.



>
>
That fact that the llvm project uses the GCC C/C++ frontends
> does not means that llvm is a derivative of GCC.


Yeah, I guess I was hoping that would have been inferred by my question
about the parts that were derived from gcc.

Still, I shouldn't have been so snarky in my comments back to you.  But then
I really thought you were asking for it with the google comment.  Especially
since I'm using a gmail address.

I apologize for my terse, difficult to understand question, and my
snarkiness.  I hope you can accept that.  I don't want to start yet another
pissing match on a FreeBSD mailing list.  :-)

Dave

PS:  I actually do use llvm-gcc on Mac OS X