another gcc 4.2 breakage?

[David O'Brien]

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:36:52PM +0200, Simon Barner wrote:
> I have a compile fix for this problem -- the resulting binary dumps
> core though. I can commit the fix and mark the port IGNORE on RELENG_7
> until we have a proper solution.

Why be that drastic?  Just require GCC=3.4

-- 
-- David  (obrien at FreeBSD.org)
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?
Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"