Scheduler selection for web hosting

[Claus Guttesen]

> 7-current amd64 is actually seems to be VERY stable on hardware and
> software we use, so, we want to move it to production servers and
> want to get max perfomance from it for web hosting.
>
> So, what is the difference between the two? Which seems to be better
> for hosting? Is ULE bugfree and stable enogh for this?

I'm using ULE on my 8-way HP DL360 and current as of Sept. 29'th.
2007. Works like a charm. Use ufs2 (rather than zfs atm.).

-- 
regards
Claus

When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.

Shakespeare