xorg 6.9.0 mem leak

[Kris Kennaway]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:05:09PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> and the Xorg one just keeps growing and growing and growing.
> > That's a different matter though.
> 
> and that's my point

Yes, but then you and the other respondent also seemed to be claiming
something else about the other processes.  Let's focus on the
concrete, which for now is the growth in Xorg memory use.

> >   PID USERNAME    THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE    TIME   WCPU COMMAND
> >  2166 randy         4  20    0   166M   108M kserel   3:51  0.00% firefox-bin
> >  1343 randy         1  96    0   126M 83500K select   2:44  2.00% Xorg
> >  1394 randy         4  20    0   102M 51456K kserel   0:08  0.00% nautilus
> 
> and now
> 
>   PID USERNAME    THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE    TIME   WCPU COMMAND
>  2166 randy         4  20    0   166M   110M kserel   4:26  0.00% firefox-bin
>  1343 randy         1  96    0   142M 86032K select   3:14  2.39% Xorg
>  1394 randy         4  20    0   102M 51456K kserel   0:08  0.00% nautilus
> 
> notice the growth in xorg and only xorg.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20060130/c9aa5822/attachment.bin