Let's use gcc-4.2, not 4.1 -- OpenMP

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <200612151609.53750.shoesoft at gmx.net>, Stefan Ehmann writes:
>On Friday 15 December 2006 14:39, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>> Unfortunately, that is not what you have done, because you have
>> not indicated what the standard deviation on your numbers are,
>> so they are totally worthless.

>I've done 3 runs on an otherwise pretty idle system with a maximum deviation 
>of maybe 1 million instructions. So I figured that accurately calculating the 
>standard deviation would overshoot the mark for this primitive test.

If you had included this information, all would have been fine.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.