uart and puc attach conflict

[Gleb Smirnoff]

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 01:43:37PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
K> > I have a problem with  multi-port card based on Nm9845 chip.
K> > It's a card with 4 com-ports.
K> > It perfectly works with puc(4) and sio(4) drivers if they compiled into 
K> > kernel.
K> > or with puc(4) and uart(4) drivers if they loaded manualy.
K> > But if puc(4) and uart(4) are compiled into kernel or loaded from
K> > loader.conf  - problem appears.
K> 
K> Isn't puc superceded by uart?  Why do you need both?

Shouldn't uarts attach on puc? This is what I have in 5.4-STABLE
system:

puc0: <Cronyx Omega2-PCI> mem 0xea202000-0xea202fff irq 5 at device 11.0 on pci0
uart0: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart1: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart2: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart3: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart4: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart5: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart6: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart7: <16750 or compatible> on puc0

Should it be other way in 6.0 and HEAD?

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE