RELENG_6 Kernel doesn't build due to DEVFS
Robert Watson
rwatson at FreeBSD.org
Sun Oct 2 04:44:53 PDT 2005
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Andrew Lankford wrote:
> uname -a
>
> FreeBSD bogushost 6.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 #2: Mon Sep 12 23:01:45 EDT
> 2005 root at bogushost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ARL6AMD64 amd64
>
> I haven't been able to build a GENERIC 6.0 kernel on amd64 for about a week
> now because of this error:
Make sure you buildworld before buildkernel, there was a compiler tweak,
and the new compiler version is required to build the new kernel.
Robert N M Watson
>
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1148: warning: redundant redeclaration of
> 'devfs_ops_f'
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:70: warning: previous declaration of
> 'devfs_ops_f' was here
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1159: warning: redundant redeclaration of
> 'devfs_vnodeops'
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:68: warning: previous declaration of
> 'devfs_vnodeops' was here
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1181: warning: redundant redeclaration of
> 'd
> evfs_specops'
> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:69: warning: previous declaration of
> 'devfs_specops' was here
> *** Error code 1
>
> For some reason, -Wall seems to be used when compiling this part of the
> kernel even though I didn't specify this to make.conf. As far as
> devfs_vnops.c syntax goes, I've never used sparse declarations before, so I
> wouldn't know if that's improper syntax or not. Since no one else seems to
> have complained about this, I'm wondering if I'm even following the right
> branch anymore. For the record here's the version info for the offending
> source code:
>
> * $FreeBSD: src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c,v 1.114.2.5 2005/09/26 14:36:52
> phk Exp $
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list