6.0R todo list - hash sizes
kris at obsecurity.org
Sat Oct 1 08:46:30 PDT 2005
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
> scottl@ removed:
> <td>Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small
> hash size that causes significant performance penalties.</td>
> this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any commits
> to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed then?
It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not
the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20051001/0163b0fb/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current