New malloc ready, take 42
Kris Kennaway
kris at obsecurity.org
Fri Dec 30 19:47:32 PST 2005
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:48:42PM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> Jason Evans wrote:
> >
> >On Dec 28, 2005, at 9:39 PM, David Xu wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>OK, I have linked /etc/malloc.conf to aj, this changes the performance:
> >>
> >>%super-smack ./select-key.smack 4 10000
> >>Query Barrel Report for client smacker1
> >>connect: max=23ms min=0ms avg= 5ms from 4 clients
> >>Query_type num_queries max_time min_time q_per_s
> >>select_index 80000 0 0 20480.54
> >>select_index 80000 0 0 19734.14
> >>select_index 80000 0 0 19846.49
> >>select_index 80000 0 0 20045.10
> >>select_index 80000 0 0 19544.33
> >>
> >>but it still can not beat phkmalloc. :-)
> >
> >
> >What is the performance of phkmalloc under those testing conditions?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Jason
> >
> >
> I remembered its highest number is 216xxx.
I don't believe you :-)
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20051230/54e4f025/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list