fetch extension - use local filename from content-dispositionheader (new diff)

[Martin Cracauer]

Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote on Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 08:55:21PM +0100: 
> Martin Cracauer <cracauer at cons.org> writes:
> > DES, can you be more specific in what way I break the API?
> 
> You changed the size of struct url_stat.

Not to argue but that is an ABI change, not an API one.  I certainly
don't see how this qualifies as "disgusting" as you put it.

Ok, how about I change the inline struct to a
constructor/pointer-passing mechanism (with changed names) and we bump
the shared library version number?

That way fields can be added in an ABI and API backwards-compatible
manner in the future.  The way it is organized right now libfetch
effectivly shields the application from HTTP headers and the API
chosen for header information transportation is locked against
extensions.

Martin
-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauer <cracauer at cons.org>   http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today.      http://www.freebsd.org/