About extensible prinf(3), a slightly long X-mas card
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Sat Dec 17 02:35:04 PST 2005
In message <20051217102835.GC33190 at uk.tiscali.com>, Brian Candler writes:
>Perhaps the semantics of this extended printf() are so far divorced from the
>standard one that you might as well just call it something else? e.g.
>
> ext_printf()
the reasons not to are
ext_printf()
ext_fprintf()
ext_sprintf()
ext_snprintf()
ext_asprintf()
ext_vprintf()
ext_vfprintf()
ext_vsfprintf()
ext_vasfprintf()
There is little or no point in replicating all of this stuff.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list