nullfs fixed ? (was: More into /etc/rc.d/jail)

Emanuel Strobl Emanuel.strobl at gmx.net
Tue Aug 9 22:00:58 GMT 2005


Am Dienstag, 9. August 2005 23:47 CEST schrieb Jeremie Le Hen:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> > And you don't suffer from a big disk performance degradation with
> > that? If you don't have I/O load it doesn't matter but I need usual
> > I/O performance so I give each jail its own partition (GPT
> > partitions). But I think some good guys are looking for fixing the
> > performance issue like they already solved the nullfs problem :)
> > Thanks again for that! (Jeff?)
>
> Are you sure that nullfs has been fixed ?  In this case, the warning
> at the end of mount_nullfs(8) manpage should be removed.

I haven't done my own benchmarks yet, but I'm quiet sure that was fixed 
about two or three months ago in 6.0-current. At that time I was figuring 
out how to avoid nullfs, but decided to keep using it, so I was conviced 
that it's been solved ;)
But I think Jeff can tell you more, if I don't mix up names again....

-Harry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20050810/f1525fb0/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list