Proper way to run bind9

Doug Barton DougB at FreeBSD.org
Tue Sep 28 06:46:38 PDT 2004


On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Juha Saarinen wrote:

>> That same man page then defines the behavior for SIGINT and SIGTERM.
>> Killing named with a signal in this case is harmless, and should be
>> functionally equivalent to 'rndc stop', except in those cases where rndc
>> is buggered for some reason.
>
> Yebbut...  hows does that justify ignoring the vendor supplied
> directions for the software in question? We're supposed to use rndc,
> not signals.

How about this. I promise that if there is ever a day when what is 
happening now DOESN'T work, I will fix it. Sound like a deal?

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection



More information about the freebsd-current mailing list