Transparent bridges (a. k. a. HUB-to-PCI bridges)?
Scott Long
scottl at freebsd.org
Wed Nov 24 05:56:14 PST 2004
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>
>> Trying to understand your nomenclature John, so that I can follow this
>> thread.
>
>
> I'm no John Kennedy, nor even John Baldwin, but I'll give this a shot. :-)
>
>> Can you please elaborate on the following .... please ;-\
>>
>> 1. PCI bridges - Host-PCI
>> - PCI-PCI
>
>
> A host-PCI bridge is typically part of the "southbridge" chip of modern
> motherboards; on Intel motherboards this is also called the ICH chip,
> such as the 82801AA/BA/CA/etc. VIA Southbridges include the
> VT8233/8235/8237/etc.
Nope. The southbridge typically holds a PCI-ISA bridge. The host-pci
bridge is usually found in the northbridge part of the chipset. The
whole point it to bridge the CPU to one or more PCI buses.
>
> A PCI-PCI bridge is commonly found on multifunction PCI cards, an
> example would be the DEC 21151 chip found on various four-port NICs.
PCI-PCI bridges are also quite common on motherboards, especially with
PCI-X.
>
>> 2. OOPish device object (device_t) ?
>
>
> True OOP involves encapsulation, polymorphism, and inheritence, and
> requires language support which is not really available in pure C. That
> being said, careful programming in C lets you create several
> closely-related structs for different types of "objects" which can all
> be utilized by a common set of functions.
>
> The most common example of this would probably be the
> protocol-independent struct sockaddr, which can handle IPv4, IPv6, and
> other types of network address formats using a common structure (or a
> related group of structures, depending on how you want to look at it).
> See "man getaddrinfo".
The particular reference to device_t refers to it's ability to have
limited inheritence of methods from it's parent 'class'.
>
>> 3. $PIR table
>
>
> Stands for PCI Interrupt Routing table. When your computer boots, the
> BIOS is responsible for configuring at least the devices required to
> boot such that they and the BIOS agree as to which IRQ each device ought
> to use.
>
> Blah, I couldn't find a good link outside of Microsoft, but see here:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/archive/pciirq.mspx
>
Scott
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list