[TEST] make -j patch [take 2]
ru at freebsd.org
Fri Nov 12 03:58:40 PST 2004
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 12:23:30PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20041112111732.GH41844 at ip.net.ua>, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> >On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:24:12AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> >> It would actually give me _more_ control over make's behaviour. I could,
> >> for example, build the tool with -j4, but run the tool with -j2. Suppose
> >> that is a long running regression test that I don't want to occupy my
> >> 4 processor machine, but I want the tool for the test to build fast.
> >Here's the patch that changes the -j behavior the way I want it:
> I think that patch is a bad idea.
Care to explain?
ru at FreeBSD.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20041112/9e3bbe5b/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current