SF Bay area hackfest

[Brad Knowles]

At 12:22 PM -0800 2004/03/24, Julian Elischer wrote:

>  who cares?
>
>  On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote:
>
>>  On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:01:11PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>>  > Let's get basic functionality woring on x86 and amd64 before we start
>>  > diverging into optimization strategies.
>>
>>  Uh, what about basic functionalty on Sparc64 and Alpha?

	Well, it depends.  Would things be broken for SPARC64, or would 
it just not have TLS (which could presumably be added later)?

	If things would be broken for SPARC64, then I would be very 
disappointed to be unable to get my Ultra 10 clones up and working in 
the near future.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)