[PATCH] for SCHED_ULE & libpthread issue (was Re: I like
SCHED_4BSD)
Johan Pettersson
manlix at demonized.net
Thu Mar 18 00:40:57 PST 2004
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:30:45 -0800
"David O'Brien" <obrien at freebsd.org> wrote:
> Do people think we should commit this?
>
> > --- sched_ule.c.orig Fri Feb 13 05:24:48 2004
> > +++ sched_ule.c Fri Feb 13 05:37:53 2004
> > @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
> > #define SCHED_INTERACTIVE(kg) \
> > (sched_interact_score(kg) < SCHED_INTERACT_THRESH)
> > #define SCHED_CURR(kg, ke) \
> > - (ke->ke_thread->td_priority != kg->kg_user_pri || \
> > + (ke->ke_thread->td_priority < kg->kg_user_pri || \
> > SCHED_INTERACTIVE(kg))
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -1166,11 +1166,8 @@
> > */
> > if ((ke->ke_flags & KEF_ASSIGNED) == 0) {
> > if (TD_IS_RUNNING(td)) {
> > - if (td->td_proc->p_flag & P_SA) {
> > - kseq_load_rem(KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu), ke);
> > - setrunqueue(td);
> > - } else
> > - kseq_runq_add(KSEQ_SELF(), ke);
> > + kseq_load_rem(KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu), ke);
> > + setrunqueue(td);
If it makes the situation better, why not? It sounds likes it works well
for Peter, Brian and Arjan. I have not tested it though.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list